Committed to addressing the country’s severe air pollution, China is attempting a shift from coal to natural gas and is considering a variety of sources, including domestic and imported gas options, as well as creating its own synthetic gas from coal. A team of researchers led by Princeton University investigated the environmental impacts of transitioning from coal to natural gas in China, exploring implications on air quality, carbon mitigation, and water stress by the year 2020.
The findings, published in Nature Sustainability, warn that the use of coal-based synthetic natural gas, known by the acronym “SNG,” would increase carbon emissions and water demand, especially in regions in China that already have high per capita carbon emissions and water scarcity. Overall, the researchers find that a switch from coal to other natural gas types does produce air, carbon, and water co-benefits when methane leakage, a powerful greenhouse gas, is well controlled.
Subscribe to our Newsletter!
Receive selected content straight into your inbox.
However, there are trade-offs when it comes to the degree of improvements for air quality and water scarcity — depending on which sector the natural gas is used to substitute for coal and where that substitution takes place. The paper is among the first to analyze the interactions between air quality, carbon emissions, and water use in both energy production and consumption. The paper highlights the need for an integrated, strategic approach when reshaping energy systems. Study first author Yue Qin said:
“Assessing air quality, carbon emissions, and water scarcity impacts across local, regional, and global levels is crucial to capturing potential co-benefits while avoiding unintended consequences.”
Study principal investigator Denise Mauzerall said:
“Although there is a lot of discussion on the need for a clean energy supply transition, in what sector the clean energy is used, and what it is displacing is also critical in determining air quality, carbon, and water co-benefits.
“While the paper focuses on China, its general conclusions are widely applicable.”
The researchers set out to analyze the relationship between the energy industry and its effects on air quality, carbon, and water. These environmental issues are frequently addressed individually, but the energy sector affects each of these areas in distinct ways and energy policies can either bring co-benefits or disbenefits. China became the case study because of its plans to reduce its dependence on coal and transition, in part, to natural gas as a way to improve air quality.
The authors were interested in the broader environmental implications of this move, which has global implications for sustainable development. Today, China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption. Natural gas — the cleanest fossil fuel — accounts for only 6 percent of China’s primary energy consumption, against a global average of approximately 16 percent. The global average has been steadily rising about 15 percent every year since 2000.
Environmental impacts of switching from coal to natural gas
To understand the environmental impacts of a coal-to-natural-gas switch, the researchers combined an energy production/use lifecycle analysis, which charts a product’s life from start to finish, with an integrated environmental impact assessment. For each of six major gas sources, they examined the impacts of substituting coal with a fixed amount of additional natural gas on resulting air quality improvements, carbon mitigation and water stress across China.
The gas sources were chosen based on government and industrial plans for 2020 and included conventional gas, synthetic natural gas, shale gas, imported liquified natural gas, imported Eastern Russia gas, and imported Central Asia gas. The researchers identified air, carbon, and water as their “environmental targets” because of the global and national interest in these areas. Also, the simultaneous examination of these three areas could help avoid severe, unintended environmental consequences.
The researchers found that, except for coal-based synthetic natural gas, replacing coal with natural gas generally has benefits for air quality, carbon mitigation, and water stress. Depending on the gas source type and how it will be used, switching from coal to gas sources (other than synthetic natural gas) leads to substantial CO2 emission reductions as well as reductions in water use. Reductions of 60-120 million metric tons of CO2 could be seen, which is equivalent to the national total of CO2 emissions in the Philippines.
In terms of water, reductions of 20 to 60 million cubic meters is possible when substituting 30 billion cubic meters of gas for coal. But coal-based synthetic natural gas is another story. Synthetic natural gas increases carbon emissions and water consumption in China’s northwestern provinces, which already suffer from high per capita carbon emissions and severe water scarcity. Qin said:
“Importantly, as the regions with high air pollution do not overlap with regions with high water stress, and substitution in different sectors bring different levels of air quality and water impacts, there are trade-offs in the magnitude of air quality and water improvements.”
Overall, the gas source affects air quality, carbon, and water in different ways depending on how it’s used. Qin added:
“Our findings show why it is critical to understand the underlying air-carbon-water synergies and trade-offs so that China, as well as other developing countries, can properly design clean energy transition pathways according to their local environmental priorities.”
“The development of new energy systems provides an opportunity to simultaneously reduce multiple environmental impacts, including domestic air pollution, local water scarcity, and global climate change.
“Ultimately, a full transition away from carbon-based fuels will be necessary to address climate change. In other research, we have found that renewable energy provides the largest co-benefits for air quality, carbon mitigation, and reduced water consumption of any known energy sources.”
Provided by: Princeton University [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]