Higher Concentration of Metal in Moon’s Craters Provides New Insights to Its Origin

View of Moon limb, with Earth on the Horizon. (Image: via NASA Apollo 11 Mission)

Life on Earth would not be possible without the Moon; it keeps our planet’s axis of rotation stable, which controls seasons and regulates our climate. However, there has been considerable debate over how the Moon was formed studying the Moon’s craters. The popular hypothesis contends that the Moon was formed by a Mars-sized body colliding with Earth’s upper crust, which is poor in metals. But new research suggests the Moon’s subsurface is more metal-rich than previously thought, providing new insights that could challenge our understanding of that process.

Today, a study published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters sheds new light on the composition of the dust found at the bottom of the Moon’s craters. Led by Essam Heggy, research scientist of electrical and computer engineering at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, and co-investigator of the Mini-RF instrument onboard NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the team members of the Miniature Radio Frequency (Mini-RF) instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission used radar to image and characterize this fine dust. The researchers concluded that the Moon’s subsurface may be richer in metals (i.e., Fe and Ti oxides) than scientists had believed.

Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Receive selected content straight into your inbox.

A higher concentration of metal in the Moon's craters has scientists reexamining the Moon's origins.
It is possible, say the researchers that the discrepancy between the amount of iron on the Earth’s crust and the Moon could be even greater than scientists thought, which pulls into question the current understanding of how the Moon was formed. (Image: TheDigitalArtist via Pixabay)

Moon’s craters

According to the researchers, the fine dust at the bottom of the Moon’s craters is actually ejected materials forced up from below the Moon’s surface during meteor impacts. When comparing the metal content at the bottom of larger and deeper craters to that of the smaller and shallower ones, the team found higher metal concentrations in the deeper craters. What does a change in recorded metal presence in the subsurface have to do with our understanding of the Moon? The traditional hypothesis is that approximately 4.5 billion years ago there was a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized proto-planet (named Theia).

Most scientists believe that that collision shot a large portion of Earth’s metal-poor upper crust into orbit, eventually forming the Moon. One puzzling aspect of this theory of the Moon’s formation has been that the Moon has a higher concentration of iron oxides than the Earth — a fact well-known to scientists. This particular research contributes to the field in that it provides insights about a section of the Moon that has not been frequently studied and posits that there may exist an even higher concentration of metal deeper below the surface.

The fact that our Moon could be richer in metals than the Earth challenges the notion that it was portions of Earth’s mantle and crust that were shot into orbit. A greater concentration of metal deposits may mean that other hypotheses about the Moon’s formation must be explored. (Image: via pixabay / CC0 1.0)
The fact that our Moon could be richer in metals than the Earth challenges the notion that it was portions of Earth’s mantle and crust that were shot into orbit. A greater concentration of metal deposits may mean that other hypotheses about the Moon’s formation must be explored. (Image: susan-lu4esm via Pixabay)

It is possible, say the researchers, that the discrepancy between the amount of iron on the Earth’s crust and the Moon could be even greater than scientists thought, which pulls into question the current understanding of how the Moon was formed. The fact that our Moon could be richer in metals than the Earth challenges the notion that it was portions of Earth’s mantle and crust that were shot into orbit. A greater concentration of metal deposits may mean that other hypotheses about the Moon’s formation must be explored. It may be possible that the collision with Theia was more devastating to our early Earth, with much deeper sections being launched into orbit, or that the collision could have occurred when Earth was still young and covered by a magma ocean.

Alternatively, more metal could hint at a complicated cool-down of an early molten Moon surface, as suggested by several scientists. According to Heggy:

Wes Patterson, of Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory, principal investigator for Mini-RF and a co-author of the study, added:

Provided by: University of Southern California [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest

Recomended Stories

Send this to a friend