A UK-wide study found that 60 percent of home-compostable plastics do not fully disintegrate in home compost bins and inevitably end up in our soil.
The study also found that citizens are confused about the labels of compostable and biodegradable plastics, leading to incorrect plastic waste disposal. These results highlight the need to revise and redesign this supposedly sustainable plastic waste management system.
Subscribe to our Newsletter!
Receive selected content straight into your inbox.
Global plastic pollution remains one of the biggest environmental challenges of our time. A new OECD report shows that plastic consumption has quadrupled over the past 30 years. Globally, only 9 percent of plastic waste is recycled, while 50 percent ends up in landfills, 22 percent evades waste management systems, and 19 percent is incinerated.
In response to this pollution crisis, several countries have set targets to eliminate all single-use plastics and to make plastic packaging 100 percent recyclable, reusable, or compostable by 2025. As a result, compostable plastics are becoming more common as the demand for sustainable products grows.
The main applications of compostable plastics include food packaging, bags, cups and plates, cutlery, and bio-waste bags. But there are some fundamental problems with these types of plastics. They are mainly unregulated, and claims about their environmental benefits are often exaggerated.
In a new study published in Frontiers in Sustainability, researchers at University College London found that consumers are often confused about the meaning of the labels of compostable plastics and that a large amount of compostable plastics does not fully disintegrate under home composting conditions.
“Compostable plastic” describes a material that can undergo biological degradation in a compost site at a rate consistent with other known compostable materials, leaving no visible (toxic) residues. However, compostable plastics are currently incompatible with most waste management systems.
There exists no harmonized international standard for home-compostable plastics. The fate of these plastics, when thrown away or sorted for recycling, is therefore either incineration or landfill. Corresponding author Danielle Purkiss said:
“The typical fate of landfill or incineration is not usually communicated to customers, so the environmental claims made for compostable packaging can be misleading.”
The Big Compost Experiment
Purkiss and her colleagues designed a three-part citizen science study, The Big Compost Experiment, to investigate what the public thinks about home-compostable plastics, how we deal with them, and whether they entirely disintegrate in our compost.
First, participants from the UK completed an online survey about opinions and behavior surrounding compostable plastics and food waste. Then, participants were invited to take part in a home composting experiment.
Lastly, those who participated in part two were requested to search for traces of their chosen compostable plastic items in their composter. The researchers collected the data over 24 months. Purkiss explained:
“Our study was created in response to feedback from the public and stakeholders from industry, policy, and third sector organizations, which highlighted many systemic issues in the manufacturing, use, and disposal of compostable plastic packaging.”
The results show a general willingness to make sustainable choices by buying compostable plastics. However, participants showed confusion about the labeling and identification of these plastics.
Out of a randomized sample of 50 item images, the researchers found that 46 percent showed no identifiable home composting certification or standards labeling, and 14 percent showed an industrial composting certificate. Purkiss said:
“This shows that there is a current lack of clear labeling and communication to ensure that the public can identify what industrially compostable or compostable home packaging is and how to dispose of it correctly.”
But a more shocking result is that 60 percent of plastic certified as home-compostable did not fully disintegrate in home compost bins. Purkiss went on to say:
“Compostable packaging does not break down effectively in the range of UK home composting conditions, creating plastic pollution. Even packaging certified as home compostable is not breaking down effectively.”
The participants indicated that they use compost in their flower and vegetable gardens. However, as the experiment results show that the compost contains plastic that has not entirely disintegrated, plastic inevitably ends up in the soil of UK citizens.
The experiment also showed that compost bins are essential for biodiversity, with pictures sent in by the participants showing 14 different categories of organisms, such as fungi, mites, and worms.
Revising the system
The question remains whether compostable plastics serve as a solution to our widespread plastic pollution problem. Purkiss explained:
“Compostable plastics are potentially useful for products not suited to recycling due to contamination, such as tea bags, fruit labels, takeaway food packaging, and certain hygiene products. However, these products typically end up in a landfill.”
But the research shows that, in this case, the better solution is to send compostable plastics to industrial composting facilities, where composting conditions are regulated. Purkiss said:
“We have shown that home composting, being uncontrolled, is largely ineffective and is not a good method of disposal for compostable packaging.”
Overall, there is a need for the revision and improvement of home-compostable plastics. Purkiss concluded:
“The idea that a material can be sustainable is a widespread misconception. Only a system of production, collection, and reprocessing of a material can be sustainable.”
Provided by Frontiers [Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.]