The Black Sea Drone Incident: Avoiding ‘Accidental’ War

A Russian jet spraying a U.S. drone with fuel.

Released by the Pentagon, the drone’s own video captures the Russian aircraft apparently spraying the drone with fuel, then deliberately colliding with it. (Image: via U.S. European Command / handout)

The extraordinary footage of a Russian jet intercepting a U.S. drone over the Black Sea demonstrates just how potentially disastrous such encounters outside actual war zones can be. Released by the Pentagon, the drone’s own video captures the Russian aircraft apparently spraying the drone with fuel, then deliberately colliding with it. The incident matches similar aggressive displays by the Russian air force in the region, the Pentagon claimed.

But beyond such acts of brinkmanship connected to the war in Ukraine, the Black Sea confrontation highlights just how easily these military interactions might lead to war breaking out “accidentally”.

Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Receive selected content straight into your inbox.

We are seeing these close encounters of the military, naval, and aviation kind increasingly often, too. In 2021, it was reported that Russian aircraft and two coastguard ships shadowed a British warship near Crimea. And last year, Australia’s defense ministry said a Chinese fighter jet harassed one of its military aircraft in international airspace over the South China Sea. The risk of these dangerous “games” triggering something more serious is clear — but there are few rules or regulations preventing it.

Pentagon video: drone’s eye view of the Russian jet releasing fuel as it approaches.
Pentagon video: drone’s eye view of the Russian jet releasing fuel as it approaches. (Image: via U.S. European Command / handout)

Reckless behavior

All militaries must comply with basic international law on questions of safety, but there are large exemptions and separate arrangements that fill the gaps. Historically, the U.S. and Soviet Union led the way in creating some rules to control incidents on and over the high seas during the Cold War. The basic rule was that both sides should avoid risky maneuvers and “remain well clear to avoid risk of collision.” To reduce the risk of collisions, craft in close proximity should be able to communicate and, where possible, be visible. They should not simulate attacks on each other.

Later, Russia copied this agreement with 11 NATO countries, and an Indo-Pacific version — the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea — was added in 2014. While primarily between the U.S. and China, at least half a dozen other countries have promised to abide by it.

Supplementary rules for air-to-air military encounters followed. These usefully added that “military aircrew should refrain from the use of uncivil language or unfriendly physical gestures.” Other rules emphasized professional conduct, safe speeds, and avoiding reckless behavior, “aerobatics and simulated attacks,” or the “discharge of rockets, weapons, or other objects.” The U.S. and Russia added a more specific agreement for Air Safety in Syria during the time they were operating in very close proximity, and when close calls in the air were reported.

But these are all “soft” rules. They’re not treaty obligations with compliance mechanisms, and they are only voluntarily adopted by some countries. Furthermore, there are no precise definitions of “safe” speeds or distances. New technologies — such as drones and other interception techniques — add another level of unregulated complexity.

Missile tests

Few things are as frightening as missiles traveling toward or over another country without consent or warning. The original Soviet-era rule involved mutual notification of planned missile launches. But this only ever applied to intercontinental or submarine-launched missiles, not short-range weapons or missile defense systems.

Aside from some voluntary UN codes, the only other binding missile notification agreement is between Russia and China. China and the U.S. do not directly share launch notification information, nor do the other nuclear powers. Some, like North Korea and Iran, even violate the missile prohibitions directly placed on them by the UN Security Council.

President John F. Kennedy with military chiefs during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
Birth of the hotline: President John F. Kennedy with military chiefs during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. (Image: Public Domain via Wikimedia)

War games and hotlines

Militaries need to practice. But this becomes risky when pretend can look very much like an actual attack — especially when fear and paranoia are added to the mix. North Korea is a modern example of this, but there have been incidents in the past of large-scale wargames almost sparking a nuclear exchange. In 1983, for example, misinterpreted military intelligence led to the U.S. going to DEFCON 1 — the highest of the nuclear threat categories — during a tense period of the Cold War.

There were agreements about the notification of major strategic exercises between the U.S. and Soviet Union, but beyond advance warning, even these failed to set out what best practice actually looks like (such as allowing observers or not allowing an exercise to look identical to a full-blown attack). More importantly, there is no international law governing such questions — perhaps most critically, how leaders should be able to communicate directly, quickly, and continuously.

A “hotline” was first agreed upon in 1963 after the Cuban Missile Crisis. While a direct link doesn’t guarantee the phone will necessarily be answered or the subsequent conversation sincere, it does at least offer a channel to avoid confusion and de-escalate quickly.

A second-tier hotline allowing commanders on the ground to communicate directly is also useful, such as the one now linking Russian and American militaries to avoid an accidental clash over Ukraine. But such dual systems are the exception, not the rule. Nor are hotlines particularly stable — the one between North and South Korea, for example, has been cut and restored numerous times. And they are not mandated by international law — emblematic of a wider situation where the risks of getting it wrong are very real indeed.

Alexander Gillespie, Professor of Law, University of Waikato

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Follow us on TwitterFacebook, or Pinterest

Recommended Stories

Illustration of Chinese scholar Qian Mu, wearing traditional clothing and glasses.

Qian Mu: Guardian of Chinese Tradition in the Shadow of Communism (Part 1)

In 1949, as the Communist Party was poised to take control of mainland China, with ...

Old photo of Chinese historian, Qian Mu, dressed in scholarly robes.

Qian Mu: Guardian of Chinese Tradition in the Shadow of Communism (Part 2)

In 1966, when Chairman Mao Zedong initiated the Cultural Revolution, China’s traditional culture faced an ...

Illustration of a man resting on a sofa.

Unlocking the Benefits of Power Naps for Productivity and Well-Being

The relentless pace of modern life often leaves us feeling drained. In the midst of ...

Colored clouds in the sky.

How a Hug Can Make Miracles Happen

Do miracles exist? Our world is governed by logic and science; extraordinary events often spark ...

A young Chinese man napping on a train.

What Is the Ubiquitous Chinese Nap Culture?

The ubiquitous Chinese nap culture is something that most foreigners usually do not follow. The ...

A laughing baby crawling on the floor.

The Science of Joy: Exploring Human Psychology Through a Babies’ Laughter

There’s something irresistibly captivating about babies’ laughter. A beacon of pure joy and an indicator ...

A laughing Japanese school girl with her friends, all in their school uniforms eating ice cream cones.

Laughter Helps You Live Longer

Research reveals that laughter can help you live longer! The Chinese saying “Smiles make one ...

John Cleese of 'Fawlty Towers.'

‘Fawlty Towers’ Reboot: John Cleese and Daughter to Revive the Iconic Sitcom 40 Years Later

Most people fondly remember classic British sitcoms such as The Office, Blackadder, Last of the ...

William Getty walking with the aid of parallel bars.

A Small Act of Kindness Helped a Boy with Cerebral Palsy Learn to Walk Again

Living with cerebral palsy is an unimaginable hardship that some people have to go through. ...

Send this to a friend